2016 imac pro for video editing mac#

The new model will not only be faster than most Mac Pro, but also be more affordable and have the built-in display. Of course it eventually depends on the application, but if performance is a major concern it seems you don’t have to worry when you choose the 5K iMac over a Mac Pro nowadays. It’s interesting to see the iMac actually outperforms the Mac Pro in many ways and is also cheaper considering the built-in high performance display. The video above by Max Yuryev shows the performance differences for video editors between the 5K iMac and a 6-core Mac Pro very well. These should be available soon are already available.įor Video Editing it is probably a good idea to get the faster graphics performance, so the 27-inch 5K iMac with built-in 256GB SSD for $2700 looks like the perfect option in my opinion: LINK 5K iMac or Mac Pro

2016 imac pro for video editing upgrade#

In the past people would get the lower cost model ( from B&H with better return policy than at Apple directly) with 8GB RAM built-in and upgrade that to at least 24GB with a 16GB RAM upgrade kit. RAM on the 27-inch iMac is user upgradeable with no loss of warranty so you should make use of this advantage as the Apple RAM is considerably more expensive. The first thing you want to know is that the new 5K iMac with its new 1866MHZ clock can be configured with up to 64GB of RAM. Moving into 4K editing the 5K display is certainly worth considering the iMac. Even the old, non-retina display was great in terms of quality compared to other sub $1,000 displays back then. The 5K iMac looks like it’s a powerful tool for video editing and the 5K built-in display is said to be gorgeous. Having owned an iMac for video editing there are some things to consider for an ideal iMac configuration. With a resolution of 4096×2348 it is actually not a “4K standard” in video-terms, it has soldered-in RAM, only on-board graphics and the performance might be too weak to drive the high resolution display while at the same time working on demanding editing tasks.īeing a Mac Pro user with a 4K display I can see the much weaker 21.5-inch 4K iMac not cutting it. 4K iMac?īasically the 21.5-inch 4K iMac looks like it is not ideal for 4K video editing. No USB-C, the new highly versatile and fast connection standard.Īnother major upgrade is the iMac display where Apple implemented phosphor LED technology in order to achieve “25% more colors”, moving from sRGB to the P3 color gamut which could certainly improve color critical tasks.

There’s two Thunderbolt 2 ports and 4 USB 3. Apple says the SSD in the new 5K iMac is “up to” 2.5 times faster than the previous model. Sounds fast. Then there’s faster SSD data transfer with the built-in storage that will probably boost startup times and loading apps. In terms of performance the new 5K iMac also comes with faster graphics, again this looks like it’s only a minor update with a 5% performance increase (3.7 “teraflops” vs. The new Skylake architecture is expected to solve this issue. This was a problem on the first 5K iMac that slowed down rendering speed after a few minutes (as reported by Max, see video below). At its base configuration the new “late 2015” model has a new 3.2GHz to 3.3GHz Core i5 and i7 Skylake processor that is about 10% faster and probably less prone to overheating. The first 5K iMac was released last year. As video makers the computer is an essential part of our workflow and the new 5K iMac is certainly a tempting proposition as an all-in-one solution for 4K editors. But should we get the new 5K iMac (or a Mac Pro) for video? The updates They also released a new 21.5-inch 4K iMac alongside. Apple just updated their 27-inch 5K iMac with slightly better specs and a better display with a larger color gamut.